Performio vs Visdum
Zero of twelve models named Performio first on the direct prompt; zero named Visdum. Performio was named by twelve of the twelve models and Visdum by eleven and Performio carries 36 labels and Visdum 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales commissions and incentive compensation page.
By framing
PerformioFirst choices, of twelve modelsVisdum
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Performio and Visdum were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 77 answers naming Performio and the 53 naming Visdum. In those answers Visdum took the first choice zero times and Performio one.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Performio Visdum first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Performio on the left and Visdum on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Performio4%#7 of 13Visdum2%#8 of 13What the models said about Performio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“What to Avoid on a Budget - Visdum, CaptivateIQ, Performio” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Low-Moderate Caution... "No real what-if forecasting"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend CaptivateIQ or Performio as the top choices” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Shortlist CaptivateIQ, Performio, and Everstage” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“If you have more complex commission structures, Performio or CaptivateIQ might be worth the higher investment.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · alternative
What the models said about Visdum
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“What to Avoid on a Budget - Visdum, CaptivateIQ, Performio” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Higher entry (~$6K/year min); custom setup fee.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“Visdum is the strongest pick for a tight budget ... start with Visdum” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Visdum if finance-led operations and ASC 606 / audit-ready reporting are especially important” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Visdum is a strong fit for high-growth mid-market businesses with complex commission structures” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.