Partner relationship management · October 2026 Edition
PartnerStack vs Unifyr
One of fourteen models named PartnerStack first on the direct prompt; zero named Unifyr. PartnerStack was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Unifyr by nine and PartnerStack carries 43 labels and Unifyr 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate26%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4314A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, PartnerStack reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Channeltivity was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. PartnerPortal.io vs PartnerStack · PartnerPortal.io vs Unifyr · Channeltivity vs PartnerStack
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the partner relationship management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PartnerStackFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUnifyr
Direct10
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained001 against PartnerStack
Scale-constrained11
Negative0010 against PartnerStack · 1 against Unifyr
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where PartnerStack and Unifyr stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
PartnerStack Unifyr first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PartnerStack on the left and Unifyr on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where PartnerStack and Unifyr stood in it.
PartnerStack first, Unifyr not the choice
1 of 14 modelsUnifyr was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Grok 4.1 FastPartnerStack alternatives: Channelscaler, Channeltivity, Kiflo PRM
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniImpartner PRM alternatives: Channeltivity, PartnerStack, Salesforce PRM, ZINFI Unified Partner Management
Gemini 3.5 FlashChanneltivity alternatives: Channelscaler, Impartner PRM, Introw, Kiflo PRM, PartnerStack
Mistral SmallChanneltivity alternatives: Impartner PRM, Unifyr
Kimi K2Channelscaler alternatives: Channeltivity, Impartner PRM, PartnerStack
GPT-6 LunaChanneltivity alternatives: Magentrix PRM, PartnerStack, Salesforce PRM
Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Kiflo PRM alternatives: Channeltivity, Salesforce PRM
Perplexity SonarHubSpot CRM alternatives: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales, Zoho CRM
DeepSeek V4 FlashChannelscaler alternatives: Channeltivity, Impartner PRM, ZINFI Unified Partner Management
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice alternatives: Channeltivity, Impartner PRM, Kademi, Zinfi Unified Partner
Qwen 3.7 FlashImpartner PRM alternatives: Channelscaler, HubSpot Partners, ZINFI Unified Partner Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXChannelscaler, Channeltivity alternatives: Impartner PRM, Salesforce PRM, ZINFI Unified Partner Management
MiniMax M2.5no first choice
Muse Glimmer 30BJourneyBee alternatives: Channeltivity, Impartner PRM, PartnerPortal.io, Salesforce PRM
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
PartnerStack leads by thirteen points.
PartnerStack13%#3 of 12Unifyr0%#– of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
PartnerStack leads by four points.
PartnerStack6%#5 of 11Unifyr2%#8 of 11Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
PartnerStack0%#7 of 9Unifyr0%#6 of 9What the models said about PartnerStack
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Avoid or be cautious with Impact and PartnerStack if your priority is to minimize commission-based costs on partner sales.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“Impact and PartnerStack are two PRM platforms that may be worth avoiding due to their commission-based pricing models” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid platforms that: 1. Charge percentage fees on your partner sales (Impact.com, PartnerStack)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
What the models said about Unifyr
No label in this category carried a quote.
Also compared
PartnerPortal.io vs PartnerStackPartnerPortal.io vs UnifyrChanneltivity vs PartnerStackChanneltivity vs UnifyrChannelscaler vs PartnerStackChannelscaler vs UnifyrImpartner PRM vs PartnerStackImpartner PRM vs UnifyrPartnerStack vs ZINFI Unified Partner ManagementPartnerStack vs Kiflo PRMZINFI Unified Partner Management vs UnifyrKiflo PRM vs UnifyrAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full PRM standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.