GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Saleshandy Lead Finder · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Saleshandy Lead Finder

5Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Saleshandy Lead Finder was named 2 times in Sales intel, where Apollo.io led with 76%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business15 of 44

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 44

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In sales intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Saleshandy Lead Finder for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales intelligence and contact data	Sales	0%	21 of 44	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 76%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Saleshandy Lead Finder yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Saleshandy Lead Finder across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“852M+ contacts, real-time verification (<3% bounce), AI search, unlimited emails.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales intel · budget prompt · alternative

“Independent testing gave it the highest email accuracy at the lowest cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Saleshandy Lead Finder, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Saleshandy Lead Finder was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Apollo.io5 of 55Not in the top three

Lusha5 of 50Not in the top three

ZoomInfo5 of 50Not in the top three

UpLead4 of 50Not in the top three

Cognism3 of 50Not in the top three

Lead4113 of 50Not in the top three

LeadIQ2 of 50Not in the top three

Hunter1 of 50Not in the top three

NeverBounce1 of 50Not in the top three

RocketReach1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Saleshandy Lead Finder. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 5 answers that named Saleshandy Lead Finder and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

artisan.co1

brightdata.com1

cleanlist.ai1

cognism.com1

demandbase.com1

evaboot.com1

findymail.com1

leadfeeder.com1

lonescale.com1

lusha.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Saleshandy Lead Finder came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

artisan.co/blog/best-b2b-data-providers1

brightdata.com/blog/web-data/best-b2b-data-providers1

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-04-20-best-b2b-contact-database-software1

cognism.com/blog/b2b-contact-database1

demandbase.com/blog/b2b-data-vendors1

evaboot.com/blog/b2b-data-providers1

findymail.com/blog/best-b2b-contact-databases1

leadfeeder.com/blog/lead-enrichment/b2b-contact-database1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Saleshandy Lead Finder's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Saleshandy Lead Finder, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at saleshandy.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.