GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Palantir Foundry · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Palantir Foundry

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Palantir Foundry was named 1 time in DMP, where Segment led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market126 of 183

under the label threshold

Enterprise45 of 174

under the label threshold

In dmp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Palantir Foundry for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data management platforms	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	126 of 183	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Segment at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Palantir Foundry yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Palantir Foundry across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Palantir Foundry, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Palantir Foundry was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud2 of 32Not in the top three

BigQuery1 of 31Not in the top three

Databricks1 of 31Not in the top three

Salesforce Data Cloud1 of 31Not in the top three

Snowflake1 of 31Not in the top three

Adobe Audience Manager1 of 30Not in the top three

Cloudera Data Platform1 of 30Not in the top three

Collibra1 of 30Not in the top three

Denodo Platform1 of 30Not in the top three

Fivetran1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Palantir Foundry. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 3 answers that named Palantir Foundry and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

domo.com2

fortegrp.com2

matillion.com2

peerspot.com2

blog.hubspot.com1

cdp.com1

cio.com1

clickup.com1

data.world1

datamation.com1

Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Palantir Foundry came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

domo.com/learn/article/best-data-management-platforms2

fortegrp.com/insights/top-19-data-management-tools-platforms-in-the-usa2

matillion.com/learn/blog/data-management-platforms2

peerspot.com/categories/data-management-platforms-dmp2

blog.hubspot.com/service/data-management-platform1

cdp.com/glossary/data-management-platform-dmp-vendors1

cio.com/article/400684/top-data-management-platforms.html1

clickup.com/blog/data-management-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Palantir Technologies is the company behind Palantir Foundry.

Website: palantir.com
Headquarters: Miami, United States
Founded: 2003
Employees: about 4,429 (2025)
Ownership: Public, PLTR on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palantir Foundry's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palantir Foundry, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at palantir.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.