GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Elastic Path · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Elastic Path

29Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Ecommerce for enterprise buyers
Rank 20 of 98 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ecommerce · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Elastic Path for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Ecommerce platformsRevenue operations0%20 of 980%3under 10 labels · led by BigCommerce B2B Edition at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Elastic Path yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Elastic Path across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative7 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“commercetools / Elastic Path — composable/MACH for engineering-heavy teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Ecommerce · scale prompt · alternative
“Elastic Path (For custom composable needs)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Ecommerce · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Elastic Path, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Elastic Path was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Shopify26 of 2910Not in the top three
Adobe Commerce26 of 292Not in the top three
Salesforce Commerce Cloud26 of 290Not in the top three
BigCommerce25 of 294Not in the top three
commercetools23 of 290Not in the top three
SAP Commerce Cloud19 of 290Not in the top three
VTEX11 of 290Not in the top three
Spryker9 of 290Not in the top three
OroCommerce8 of 290Not in the top three
WooCommerce6 of 290Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Elastic Path. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 29 answers that named Elastic Path and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bigcommerce.com3
clarity-ventures.com3
elasticpath.comYour site3
forbes.com3
scnsoft.com3
virtocommerce.com3
agencypartner.com2
broadleafcommerce.com2
learn.g2.com2
netsolutions.com2

Twenty-three of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Elastic Path came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Elastic Path.
Website
elasticpath.com
Headquarters
Canada, Canada
Founded
2000

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Elastic Path's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Elastic Path, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at elasticpath.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack