AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › EasyDMARC · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

EasyDMARC

16Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. EasyDMARC was named 6 times in Email deliverability, where GlockApps led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In email deliverability · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EasyDMARC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Email deliverability and testing toolsMarketing0%34 of 11017%6under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EasyDMARC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EasyDMARC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00112
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Use EasyDMARC if you are already sending emails but seeing high bounce rates or spam folder placement” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Email deliverability · budget prompt · alternative
“Best paid option for small budget: EasyDMARC (~$18/mo) or Unspam (free + ~$5/mo)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email deliverability · budget prompt · alternative
“Authentication monitoring | EasyDMARC, MXToolbox” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Email deliverability · negative prompt · alternative
“EasyDMARC (Best for Authentication)” MiniMax M2.5 · Email deliverability · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Use EasyDMARC for DMARC monitoring only, not for inbox placement testing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Email deliverability · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EasyDMARC, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EasyDMARC was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
GlockApps14 of 162Not among the top eight
Google Postmaster Tools11 of 165Not among the top eight
MXToolbox11 of 163Not among the top eight
Microsoft SNDS8 of 163Not among the top eight
ZeroBounce8 of 161Not among the top eight
Validity Everest7 of 162Not among the top eight
Mailtrap7 of 161Not among the top eight
Folderly6 of 162Not among the top eight
Instantly6 of 161Not among the top eight
MailReach5 of 161Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EasyDMARC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named EasyDMARC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mailtrap.io10
sender.net10
myemailverifier.com9
omnisend.com7
instantly.ai6
saleshandy.com6
allegrow.co5
amplemarket.com5
emailtooltester.com5
getresponse.com5

Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming EasyDMARC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on easydmarc.com
1,826
subdomains included
Content
1,468
counted in the table below
Documentation
184
Product · Integration
16 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,15292026-09-28
Glossary or explainer8232026-09-22
Webinar or virtual event6342026-09-02
Conference or event6152026-09-08
Template or tool4202023-03-17
Report or ebook3412026-07-31
Comparison2612026-07-22
Case study5undated
News or press302025-12-04

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page easydmarc.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow EasyDMARC

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

EasyDMARC is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Protect and operate business-critical email with EasyDMARC across security, deliverability, and governance, with visibility and control across your entire email environment.
For
Security and IT teams
Free plan or trial
14-day free trial. No credit card required easydmarc.com
Integrations claimed
50 easydmarc.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IISOC 3GDPRSOC3SOC2EU GDPRCCPA
Customers named
Newman UniversityHarmony Designs IncPersoneel.comJules WebbHarmony Designs Inc.akaCRMFlorence BankM.I.T. Consulting
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, hosting

What EasyDMARC's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: easydmarc.com, easydmarc.com/pricing/easydmarc/msp, easydmarc.com/trust, easydmarc.com/platform, easydmarc.com/blog/category/library/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EasyDMARC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EasyDMARC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EasyDMARC by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where EasyDMARC is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name EasyDMARC, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at easydmarc.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.