AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › BQool · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

BQool

6Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BQool was named 3 times in Pricing optimization, where Pricefx led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In pricing optimization · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BQool for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Pricing optimizationRevenue operations0%19 of 760%3under 10 labels · led by Pricefx at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BQool yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BQool across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Lowest cost entry: BQool Basic ~$25/mo or RepricerExpress Express ~$44/mo for marketplace repricing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Pricing optimization · budget prompt · alternative
“Amazon-focused? Consider BQool ($25/month) or RepricerExpress ($44/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · Pricing optimization · budget prompt · alternative
“If you sell on Amazon only → BQool at $25/month is cheapest” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pricing optimization · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BQool, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BQool was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Prisync6 of 64Not among the top eight
Price2Spy5 of 60Not among the top eight
RepricerExpress3 of 61Not among the top eight
Pricefy2 of 61Not among the top eight
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management2 of 60Not among the top eight
Price2Win1 of 61Not among the top eight
Blue Yonder1 of 60Not among the top eight
Competera1 of 60Not among the top eight
Helium 101 of 60Not among the top eight
Intelligence Node1 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BQool. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named BQool and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

articsledge.com5
withorb.com5
croclub.com3
dupple.com3
getapp.com3
toolradar.com3
devopsschool.com2
emplicit.co2
g2.com2
guideflow.com2

No domain is on file for BQool, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as BQool

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BQool; a claim can dispute any of them.
BQool Basic 1

Follow BQool

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BQool's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BQool, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BQool by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where BQool is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name BQool, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.