Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 126 → 114 of 131
1 category · Named, not rankedAvast
1Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Avast was named 1 time in Identity, where Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market119 of 140
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In identity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Avast for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 119 of 140 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Avast held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Identity · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 126 → 119 of 140 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Avast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Avast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“the FTC alleged it sold granular, re-identifiable browsing data despite privacy claims” GPT-5.4 mini · Identity · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Avast, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Avast was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Avast, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Avast was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Avast. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Avast and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ftc.gov1
search.ftc.gov1
Two of the two domain citations in answers naming Avast came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
avast.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Avast takes 0% of first choices and Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
avast.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Avast takes 0% of first choices and Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “identity resolution platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best identity resolution platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,021,508 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 141,200 · 8,679 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 72,649
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 119 of 140 in identity
Segment leader
12%
Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 1 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 1 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on avast.com
10,007
subdomains included
Content
3,643
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,897
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 3,437 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 108 | 0 | 2026-03-05 | ||
| Conference or event | 34 | 0 | 2016-01-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 26 | 0 | 2014-09-01 | ||
| Comparison | 20 | 0 | 2012-08-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 5 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2005-05-30 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | |||
| News or press | 4 | 0 | 2005-05-26 | ||
| Case study | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-04-28Bail bond scams blog
- 2026-04-22Introducing avast one silver blog
- 2026-04-21Targeted ads blog
- 2026-03-30Spring break break travel scams blog
- 2026-03-05How to avoid the fake buyers flooding facebook marketplace report or ebook
- 2026-02-03Deepfake scams blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page avast.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Avast
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Avast is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Avast is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Award‑winning free antivirus, online scam protection, privacy tools and more. All in one simple app.
- For
- PC, Mac, & Android
- Price stated
- free avast.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free download avast.com
- Certifications
- “Avast Bank Mode provides isolation during financial transactions”“95% phishing-page detection rate, no false alarms”“100% real-world threat samples detected and blocked”“Total Accuracy Rating: 100%, False Positives: 0%”
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers
What Avast's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: avast.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Avast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Avast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Avast by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Avast is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Avast, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.