GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › 7th Level · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

7th Level

2Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. 7th Level was named 1 time in Sales coaching, where SalesHood led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business97 of 131

under the label threshold

Mid-market104 of 124

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In sales coaching · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named 7th Level for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales coaching and training	Sales	0%	104 of 124	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by SalesHood at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 7th Level yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 7th Level across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“7th Level — Trustpilot shows a recent complaint alleging major concerns around representations made during the sale and follow-through on implementation promises.” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales coaching · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 7th Level, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 7th Level was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Caitlin Bacher / related funnel training1 of 20Not in the top three

Cardone Training Technologies / Cardone University1 of 20Not in the top three

Cherrington Media / Adam Cherrington programs1 of 20Not in the top three

Coursiv1 of 20Not in the top three

Mastermind.com / Dean Graziosi ecosystem1 of 20Not in the top three

Movesmethod1 of 20Not in the top three

SalesHive1 of 20Not in the top three

Salesfam1 of 20Not in the top three

Second Nature1 of 20Not in the top three

Super Affiliate System Platinum1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 7th Level. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named 7th Level and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

trustpilot.com2

bbb.org1

g2.com1

sell.g2.com1

Five of the five domain citations in answers naming 7th Level came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

trustpilot.com/review/7thlevelhq.com2

bbb.org/us/fl/miami/profile/sales-training/cardone-training-technologies-inc-0633-903005521

bbb.org/us/nv/las-vegas/profile/training-program/coursiv-1086-90091500/complaints1

g2.com/categories/sales-coaching1

sell.g2.com/hubfs/Sell%20Microsite%20Files/The%20Impact%20of%20Reviews%20on%20B2B%20-%20Re1

trustpilot.com/review/experience.cherringtonmedia.com1

trustpilot.com/review/salesfam.org1

trustpilot.com/review/saleshive.com1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 7th Level's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 7th Level, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 7thlevel.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.