Index › Products › 250ok · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

250ok

10Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. 250ok was named 2 times in Email deliverability, where GlockApps led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business43 of 114

under the label threshold

Mid-market48 of 110

under the label threshold

Enterprise25 of 93

under the label threshold

In email deliverability · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named 250ok for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Email deliverability and testing tools	Marketing	0%	48 of 110	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 250ok yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 250ok across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Best for Deep Analytics: 250ok (by Proofpoint)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Email deliverability · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 250ok, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 250ok was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Validity Everest6 of 102Not among the top eight

GlockApps6 of 101Not among the top eight

Litmus5 of 102Not among the top eight

Everest4 of 100Not among the top eight

Mailgun2 of 101Not among the top eight

HubSpot2 of 100Not among the top eight

Mailgun Optimize2 of 100Not among the top eight

Mailmodo2 of 100Not among the top eight

Return Path2 of 100Not among the top eight

SendGrid2 of 100Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 250ok. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 10 answers that named 250ok and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sender.net3

amplemarket.com2

instantly.ai2

mailgun.com2

overloop.com2

revalign.io2

salesdorado.com2

securityboulevard.com2

smtp.com2

alexberman.com1

No domain is on file for 250ok, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

sender.net/blog/email-deliverability-tools3

amplemarket.com/blog/best-email-deliverability-tools2

overloop.com/blog/email-deliverability-tools2

revalign.io/best/best-deliverability-analytics-platforms-for-saas-companies2

salesdorado.com/en/inbound-marketing/email-testing-tools2

alexberman.com/email-deliverability-tools1

f6s.com/software/category/email-deliverability1

folderly.com/blog/email-deliverability-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as 250ok

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as 250ok; a claim can dispute any of them.

250ok (by Proofpoint) 1

Follow 250ok

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 250ok's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 250ok, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for 250ok by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where 250ok is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name 250ok, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.