AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Sales › Value selling › HubSpot Sales Hub vs LeveragePoint
Value selling tools · October 2026 Edition

HubSpot Sales Hub vs LeveragePoint

Two of fourteen models named HubSpot Sales Hub first on the direct prompt; two named LeveragePoint. HubSpot Sales Hub was named by eleven of the fourteen models and LeveragePoint by eight and HubSpot Sales Hub carries 17 labels and LeveragePoint 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

HubSpot Sales Hub

accepted challenger

By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in twenty-two categories this edition.

LeveragePoint

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share12%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels1712A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, HubSpot Sales Hub reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Minoa vs HubSpot Sales Hub · Minoa vs LeveragePoint · The ROI Shop vs HubSpot Sales Hub

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the value selling tools page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HubSpot Sales HubFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLeveragePoint
Direct221 against HubSpot Sales Hub · 1 against LeveragePoint
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained40
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where HubSpot Sales Hub and LeveragePoint stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
HubSpot Sales Hub LeveragePoint first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, HubSpot Sales Hub on the left and LeveragePoint on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where HubSpot Sales Hub and LeveragePoint stood in it.

HubSpot Sales Hub first, LeveragePoint not the choice

2 of 14 modelsLeveragePoint was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallHubSpot Sales Hub alternatives: Cuvama, ZoomInfo
MiniMax M2.5HubSpot Sales Hub alternatives: Clari Copilot, Gong, Outreach, Salesloft, ZoomInfo

LeveragePoint first, HubSpot Sales Hub not the choice

2 of 14 modelsHubSpot Sales Hub was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-6 LunaLeveragePoint alternatives: Mediafly Value
Muse Glimmer 30BLeveragePoint alternatives: Cuvama, Mediafly Revenue360, Symbe, ValueSelling Associates – ValueCoach AI

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastGuideflow, Symbe alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Cuvama, Gong, HubSpot Sales Hub, Minoa
DeepSeek V4 FlashMinoa alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub, The ROI Shop, ValueVisualizer
Kimi K2Minoa alternatives: HubSpot CRM, LeveragePoint, Shark Finesse

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniSalesforce Revenue Cloud alternatives: PROS Smart CPQ
Gemini 3.5 FlashThe ROI Shop alternatives: Cuvama, Ecosystems, ValueVisualizer
Perplexity SonarThe ROI Shop, ValueCore
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashXtensory alternatives: Avoma, Gong, Highspot, PandaDoc, Proposify, Seismic
GLM 4.7 FlashXSymbe alternatives: Cuvama, ValueCore

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
HubSpot Sales Hub leads by seven points.
HubSpot Sales Hub10%#2 of 11
LeveragePoint3%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
HubSpot Sales Hub leads by eight points.
HubSpot Sales Hub12%#4 of 10
LeveragePoint4%#6 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
HubSpot Sales Hub2%#– of 11
LeveragePoint2%#8 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about HubSpot Sales Hub

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about LeveragePoint

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“enterprise-focused pricing and complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“mid-market teams that want a purpose-built quantification engine with collaborative Value Models often start with LeveragePoint” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“my mid-market pick is LeveragePoint for a team building a repeatable value-selling process” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose LeveragePoint if you want to align product, pricing, and sales teams around a unified value narrative.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.