Proposify vs Loopio
Three of twelve models named Proposify first on the direct prompt; zero named Loopio. Proposify was named by twelve of the twelve models and Loopio by nine and Proposify carries 54 labels and Loopio 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the proposal software page.
By framing
ProposifyFirst choices, of twelve modelsLoopio
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Proposify and Loopio were named in the same answer forty-seven times, of the 185 answers naming Proposify and the 62 naming Loopio. In those answers Loopio took the first choice eleven times and Proposify two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | | |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Proposify Loopio first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Proposify on the left and Loopio on the right.The direct prompt
Proposify first, Loopio an alternative
3 of 12 modelsLoopio was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Proposify9%#3 of 10Loopio0%#10 of 10Loopio4%#6 of 10Proposify2%#7 of 10What the models said about Proposify
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Proposify — Multiple Critical Issues ... Proposify and SAP Ariba have the most severe and well-documented problems.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequent reports of poor customer service ... Trustpilot rating ~2.3/5; some call it "buggy and unusable."” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Predatory billing practices - Charging after cancellation, making refunds nearly impossible” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“my default pick would be Proposify if you want a balanced mix of proposal creation, approvals, tracking, and CRM-friendly workflow” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Proposify or Qwilr are the strongest starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“the best sales proposal and quote document tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be Proposify” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Loopio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Choose Loopio only if RFPs are central to your sales process — it's overkill for standard proposals.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“notoriously expensive ($$$) and require weeks of training and configuration” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Loopio is often recommended for mid-market teams (50–300 RFPs/year), priced around $25K–$75K/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“invest in Enterprise Response Management systems like Responsive (formerly RFPIO) or Loopio” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
“If you answer security questionnaires or complex RFPs, go with SiftHub or Loopio.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.