AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › GTM data and infrastructure › Market intelligence › Klue vs Crayon
Market intelligence platforms · October 2026 Edition

Klue vs Crayon

Five of fourteen models named Klue first on the direct prompt; four named Crayon. Both were named by all fourteen models and Klue carries 37 labels and Crayon 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Klue

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Crayon

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share8%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3742A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Klue reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ZoomInfo was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Apollo.io vs Klue · Apollo.io vs Crayon · ZoomInfo vs Klue

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the market intelligence platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
KlueFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCrayon
Direct54
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained004 against Klue · 4 against Crayon
Scale-constrained00
Negative012 against Crayon
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Klue and Crayon were named in the same answer 274 times, of the 302 answers naming Klue and the 308 naming Crayon. In those answers Crayon took the first choice twenty-nine times and Klue thirty-one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Klue and Crayon stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Klue Crayon first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Klue on the left and Crayon on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Klue and Crayon stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Qwen 3.7 FlashCrayon, Klue alternatives: Crunchbase, Gong, ZoomInfo

Klue first, Crayon an alternative

4 of 14 modelsCrayon was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Klue alternatives: Crayon, Improvado, ZoomInfo
Gemini 3.5 FlashApollo.io, Klue alternatives: Cognism, Crayon, Demandbase, Kompyte, Semrush
Mistral SmallApollo.io, Klue alternatives: AlphaSense, Crayon, HockeyStack
Muse Glimmer 30BKlue alternatives: 6sense, Bombora, Crayon, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Semrush, ZoomInfo

Crayon first, Klue an alternative

3 of 14 modelsKlue was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniCrayon alternatives: Contify, Klue
DeepSeek V4 FlashCrayon alternatives: 6sense, AlphaSense, Klue, Kompyte, ZoomInfo
GPT-6 LunaCrayon alternatives: Klue, Kompyte

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarZoomInfo alternatives: Apollo.io, Crayon, Klue
Grok 4.1 FastApollo.io alternatives: Crayon, HubSpot Intelligence/Marketing Hub, Klue
Llama 4 MaverickHG Insights alternatives: 6sense, AlphaSense, Bombora, Crayon, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Klue
Kimi K2Kompyte alternatives: Crayon, Klue, ZoomInfo
GLM 4.7 FlashXZoomInfo alternatives: AlphaSense, Crayon, Klue, Similarweb
MiniMax M2.5HG Insights, HockeyStack alternatives: AlphaSense, Klue, ZoomInfo

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Klue leads by two points.
Klue2%#11 of 16
Crayon0%#16 of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Klue leads by two points.
Klue8%#3 of 12
Crayon7%#4 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Klue7%#3 of 14
Crayon7%#4 of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Klue

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Avoid enterprise platforms — Klue, Crayon, AlphaSense, and ZoomInfo typically cost $10,000–$30,000+/year” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-oriented platforms like Crayon, Klue, or AlphaSense” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative

What the models said about Crayon

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Avoid enterprise-oriented platforms like Crayon, Klue, or AlphaSense if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms — Klue, Crayon, AlphaSense, and ZoomInfo” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Pick Crayon if you want the most balanced "mid-market CI platform" for day-to-day competitive tracking and sales enablement.” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.