GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Zoho Invoice · September 2026 Edition
Zoho · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Zoho Invoice

3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Zoho Invoice was named 2 times in Billing and 1 other category, where Chargebee led with 58%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In billing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zoho Invoice for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Billing and subscription managementRevenue operations0%33 of 570%1under 10 labels · led by Chargebee at 58%
Proposal softwareRevenue operations0%45 of 790%1under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 49%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zoho Invoice yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zoho Invoice across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Zoho Invoice if you are a service provider who just needs a seamless, free quote-to-invoice pipeline.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proposals · budget prompt · alternative
“even Zoho Invoice if your needs are simpler invoicing plus recurring billing” Perplexity Sonar · Billing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho Invoice, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho Invoice was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Stripe Billing2 of 32Not in the top three
Prospero1 of 31Not in the top three
Wave1 of 31Not in the top three
Zoho Subscriptions1 of 31Not in the top three
Better Proposals1 of 30Not in the top three
Billsby1 of 30Not in the top three
Canva1 of 30Not in the top three
Chargebee1 of 30Not in the top three
DocuSeal1 of 30Not in the top three
FreshBooks1 of 30Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho Invoice. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 3 answers that named Zoho Invoice and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apps365.com1
checkoutpage.com1
connectpay.com1
g2.com1
gocardless.com1
guideflow.com1
learn.g2.com1
memetik.ai1
solidgate.com1
sotion.so1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Zoho Invoice came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Zoho Office Suite is the company behind Zoho Invoice.
Website
zoho.com
Headquarters
India, India
Founded
1996

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Invoice's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Invoice, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zohoinvoice.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack