GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Warmy · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Warmy

15Judge labels

1First choices

2Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Warmy was named 9 times in Email deliverability, where GlockApps led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business78 of 114

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 110

under the label threshold

Enterprise84 of 93

under the label threshold

In email deliverability · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Warmy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Email deliverability and testing tools	Marketing	2%	11 of 110	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Warmy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Warmy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Warmy if you want a balanced platform for inbox placement testing plus warmup and ongoing deliverability management” Perplexity Sonar · Email deliverability · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Another budget-friendly option at $49 per month, covering basic warm-up needs for small teams.” Mistral Small · Email deliverability · budget prompt · alternative

“a broader suite like GlockApps or Warmy may be better, but usually costs more” GPT-5.4 mini · Email deliverability · budget prompt · alternative

“publishes its seed‑list quality (e.g., MailReach, Warmy, GlockApps Warm‑up)” MiniMax M2.5 · Email deliverability · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Warmy, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Warmy was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GlockApps12 of 156Not among the top eight

MXToolbox10 of 151Not among the top eight

Folderly9 of 150Not among the top eight

MailReach8 of 151Not among the top eight

Google Postmaster Tools7 of 153Not among the top eight

Mail-Tester7 of 150Not among the top eight

Validity Everest6 of 152Not among the top eight

ZeroBounce5 of 150Not among the top eight

Microsoft SNDS4 of 150Not among the top eight

Warmbox3 of 151Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Warmy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Warmy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

amplemarket.com9

instantly.ai9

saleshandy.com7

mailercheck.com6

mailreach.co6

mailtrap.io6

myemailverifier.com6

emailtooltester.com5

getresponse.com5

guideflow.com5

Sixty-four of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming Warmy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

amplemarket.com/blog/best-email-deliverability-tools9

mailercheck.com/articles/best-email-deliverability-tools6

myemailverifier.com/blog/email-deliverability-tools6

getresponse.com/blog/email-deliverability-tools5

inboxarmy.com/blog/12-best-email-deliverability-tools5

omnisend.com/blog/email-deliverability-tools5

saleshandy.com/blog/email-deliverability-tools5

emailtooltester.com/en/blog/best-email-deliverability-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

warmy.io ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Warmy takes 2% of first choices and GlockApps takes 34%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “email deliverability tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best email deliverability tool”

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 11 of 110 in email deliverability

Segment leader

34%

GlockApps

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 15 answers
Its own site cited: in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Warmy

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Warmy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Warmy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Warmy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Warmy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Warmy, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.