AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Constructor · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Constructor

88Judge labels
5First choices
20Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Ecommerce search for enterprise buyers
Rank 18 of 74 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 29 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Constructor →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ecommerce search · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Constructor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Ecommerce search and merchandisingMarketing0%18 of 7414%29accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Constructor yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Constructor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini03104
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01023
Grok 4.1 Fast00202
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash03014
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201203
GLM 4.7 FlashX01012
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna11002
Muse Glimmer 30B10102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels3
Paraphrase14 labels2
Comparative22 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labelsNone
Negative15 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative88 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Buy Algolia or Constructor if the gap is onsite search relevance.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Ecommerce search · comparative prompt · first choice
“start with Algolia and Constructor” GPT-6 Luna · Ecommerce search · comparative prompt · first choice
“Constructor uses transformer technology and reinforcement learning to improve product discovery and personalization” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Ecommerce search · comparative prompt · alternative
“platforms like Constructor or Searchspring can be stronger—but they’re generally not the cheapest path” GPT-5.4 mini · Ecommerce search · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“one source says to skip it if you need self-service signup, published pricing, or a free tier, because evaluation runs through sales.” Perplexity Sonar · Ecommerce search · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid mid-market tools like Constructor or Searchspring if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · Ecommerce search · budget prompt · hard negative
“enterprise-focused, custom pricing almost always $1,000+/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Ecommerce search · budget prompt · hard negative
“Constructor, Klevu, or Bloomreach may be overkill unless you can justify a higher spend.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Ecommerce search · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Constructor, over the 88 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Constructor was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Algolia78 of 8823Not among the top eight
Bloomreach Discovery69 of 884Not among the top eight
Coveo56 of 889Not among the top eight
Klevu35 of 885Not among the top eight
Searchspring31 of 884Not among the top eight
Nosto23 of 881Not among the top eight
Doofinder21 of 886Not among the top eight
Luigi's Box15 of 880Not among the top eight
Elasticsearch11 of 880Not among the top eight
Fast Simon9 of 880Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Constructor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 86 of the 88 answers that named Constructor and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com53
constructor.comYour site40
netguru.com40
clerk.io33
valiantceo.com33
g2.com29
nobi.ai24
ringly.io24
algolia.com23
gitnux.org23

282 of the 322 domain citations in answers naming Constructor came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

constructor.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Constructor takes 0% of first choices and Algolia takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “best ecommerce search and merchandising platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
6,600 a month (“constructor”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
5,042 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,005 a month
Searches its site ranks for
455 · 28 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,100
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
100 ads · 55 text, 43 image, 2 video · 26 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2024, as Constructor.io Corporation, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 34 in the year, 66 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 74 in ecommerce search
Segment leader
25%
Algolia
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
88 answers
Its own site cited
in 86 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on constructor.com
796
subdomains included
Content
252
counted in the table below
Documentation
483
Product · Integration
18 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog20862026-09-23Ecommerce, Ecommerce search
Case study18undated
Webinar or virtual event13undated
Comparison602026-01-14
Glossary or explainer302026-01-31
Report or ebook2undated
Template or tool1undated
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page constructor.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Constructor

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Constructor; a claim can dispute any of them.
Constructor (Constructor.io) 1

Follow Constructor

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Constructor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Constructor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Constructor by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Constructor is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Constructor, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at constructor.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.