Stannp vs PFL
Zero of twelve models named Stannp first on the direct prompt; one named PFL. Stannp was named by nine of the twelve models and PFL by ten and Stannp carries 21 labels and PFL 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
PFL
criticized challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the print page.
By framing
StannpFirst choices, of twelve modelsPFLAcross every category in the September 2026 Edition, Stannp and PFL were named in the same answer seventeen times, of the 51 answers naming Stannp and the 63 naming PFL. In those answers PFL took the first choice one time and Stannp three.
Every model, every framing
| Model | DirectPF | ParaphrasePF | ComparativePF | Budget-constrainedPF | Scale-constrainedPF | NegativePF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | PF | PF | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | PF | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | PF | PF | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | PF | PF | | | ||
| Mistral Small | PF | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | PF | PF | PF | | PF | PF |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | PF | PF | ||||
| Kimi K2 | PF | | | PF | PF | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
StannpPF PFL first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Stannp on the left and PFL on the right.The direct prompt
PFL first, Stannp not the choice
1 of 12 modelsStannp was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
What the models said about Stannp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Start with Click2Mail (no monthly fees) or Stannp ($0-$12/month) to test direct mail without commitment.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Safer Alternatives to Consider ... Stannp | Very low | 4.8/5 G2 rating, affordable pricing” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“Stannp (4.8/5 on G2) – good address verification, tracking, and support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
What the models said about PFL
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Takes significant time to launch campaigns... Pricing can be prohibitive for smaller teams” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Primary Concerns: Operational Transparency & Speed ... "quote-only" pricing structures” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“heavier setup and higher cost — generally more enterprise-oriented than "mid-sized."” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“PFL commands roughly 75% market share ... PFL suits mid-market and enterprise teams that prioritize print quality and deep, reliable integrations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Recommendation: PFL” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Runner-up: PFL if you need more sophisticated B2B orchestration and multi-channel campaigns.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.