One of fourteen models named InfoSum first on the direct prompt; zero named Habu. InfoSum was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Habu by seven and InfoSum carries 39 labels and Habu 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data clean rooms page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, InfoSum and Habu were named in the same answer forty-one times, of the 119 answers naming InfoSum and the 52 naming Habu. In those answers Habu took the first choice two times and InfoSum two.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | HA | HA | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | HA | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise SaaS (e.g., LiveRamp, InfoSum) at $500+/month unless trialing.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“pricing and complexity are often overkill for mid-market needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“like LiveRamp (Habu), InfoSum, or Decentriq is rarely feasible, as licensing fees for these platforms often run in the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars annually” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“InfoSum – Praised for its flexible collaboration capabilities and suitability for mid-market needs, without requiring enterprise-scale resources.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“I would recommend InfoSum as a privacy-safe data collaboration platform for a mid-sized B2B company.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend InfoSum if your priority is privacy-safe data collaboration with partners” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“What to Avoid as a Mid-Market B2B - LiveRamp / Habu: Enterprise-grade” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Only purchase a dedicated independent SaaS DCR (like LiveRamp/Habu) if you have a specific, high-revenue partner usecase lined up” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Top Recommendation: Habu (now LiveRamp Clean Room)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Recognized for its user-friendly interface and ability to handle multiple partnerships and advanced analytics, ideal for mid-market B2B companies.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · alternative
“modern integrations like Habu or InfoSum) that allow partners to query and analyze data directly where it already lives” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.