Zero of fourteen models named Google Postmaster Tools first on the direct prompt; one named Validity Everest. Google Postmaster Tools was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Validity Everest by twelve and Google Postmaster Tools carries 30 labels and Validity Everest 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By Google, Mountain View, California, United States, founded 1998. Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the email deliverability and testing tools page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Google Postmaster Tools and Validity Everest were named in the same answer twenty-five times, of the 77 answers naming Google Postmaster Tools and the 92 naming Validity Everest. In those answers Validity Everest took the first choice seven times and Google Postmaster Tools six.
| Model | DirectGP | ParaphraseGP | ComparativeGP | Budget-constrainedGP | Scale-constrainedGP | NegativeGP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | GP | GP | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | GP | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | GP | GP | GP | |||
| Mistral Small | GP | GP | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | GP | GP | GP | GP | GP | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | GP | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | GP | GP | ||||
| Kimi K2 | GP | GP | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | GP | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | GP | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | GP | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | GP |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Set up Google Postmaster Tools (free) and Microsoft SNDS (free). These are the only tools that provide direct, unvarnished reputation data” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Best free option: Stack Google Postmaster Tools, Microsoft SNDS, Yahoo Sender Hub, MXToolbox, Mail Tester, AboutMyEmail, and Sender Hub.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall for near-zero budget: free monitoring stack with Google Postmaster Tools, Microsoft SNDS, MXToolbox, and Yahoo Sender Hub.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“its pricing often starts at $20,000 to $65,000/year, making it massive overkill and too expensive for most mid-sized operations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“enterprise suites like *Validity Everest* (which can cost upward of $15,000/year) to be too complex and cost-prohibitive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“The gold standard for enterprise, but likely overkill for mid-sized companies on both features and budget.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“The gold standard for larger mid-market and enterprise brands. Extremely deep seed-testing network and comprehensive reputation monitoring, though highly priced.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“My default pick: Validity Everest” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
“Everest is the largest and most robust platform in the space... generally cost-prohibitive for SMBs.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.