GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › LLM Pulse · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

LLM Pulse

Named in 1 judge label across 1 category by 1 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 0 first choices, 0 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LLM Pulse was named 1 time in AI visibility, where Peec AI led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LLM Pulse. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryVerticalFirst choicesRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
AI visibility and answer engine tracking toolsMarketing0%33 of 460%1under 10 labels · led by Peec AI at 25%

By model

How each model treated LLM Pulse across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Opus 500000
Claude Opus 4.800000
GPT-6 Astra00000
GPT-5.6 Sol00000
Gemini 3.1 Pro01001
Perplexity Sonar Pro00000

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A highly rated dedicated tracker that provides excellent measurement across the five surfaces” Gemini 3.1 Pro · AI visibility · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Names read as LLM Pulse

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LLM Pulse; a claim can dispute any of them.
Every label used the canonical name.
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LLM Pulse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.

Sponsor instead