# Square Appointments: how AI models rank it, October 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition. Named in 5 judge labels across 1 categories by 5 of 14 models. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/vendors/square-appointments/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting scheduling | 0% | 22 | 20% | 5 |

## What the models said for it

- "Need payments or service-business bookings? Choose Square Appointments." (Perplexity Sonar, Scheduling)
- "would be Calendly, Acuity, or Square Appointments" (Llama 4 Maverick, Scheduling)
- "Good for in-person sales teams" (MiniMax M2.5, Scheduling)

## And against it

- "Charges transaction fees despite being marketed as "free"" (Kimi K2, Scheduling)

## Movement since September 2026

Floor: 11 points of share, measured on the calibration repeat. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise.

- Meeting scheduling: 0% to 0%, ±0. New · not ranked in September 2026 · rank 22 of 58.

## Record

- Method: https://gtm-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://gtm-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as GTM AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, gtm-ai-index.com.
