# Proposify: how AI models rank it, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition. Named in 64 judge labels across 3 categories by 12 of 12 models. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/vendors/proposify/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal software | 13% | 2 | 17% | 54 |
| CPQ | 2% | 6 | 14% | 7 |
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | 0% | 50 | 33% | 3 |

## What the models said for it

- "my default pick would be Proposify if you want a balanced mix of proposal creation, approvals, tracking, and CRM-friendly workflow" (GPT-5.4 mini, Proposals)
- "For most mid-market B2B companies, Proposify or Qwilr are the strongest starting points" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, Proposals)
- "the best sales proposal and quote document tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be Proposify" (Llama 4 Maverick, Proposals)
- "Proposify - ranks as best overall for Configure, Price, Quote (CPQ) at $19-$49/month." (Llama 4 Maverick, CPQ)

## And against it

- "Proposify — Multiple Critical Issues ... Proposify and SAP Ariba have the most severe and well-documented problems." (Kimi K2, Proposals)
- "Frequent reports of poor customer service ... Trustpilot rating ~2.3/5; some call it "buggy and unusable."" (Grok 4.1 Fast, Proposals)
- "Predatory billing practices - Charging after cancellation, making refunds nearly impossible" (Mistral Small, Proposals)
- "Be cautious of general-purpose platforms like Proposify, Qwilr, and PandaDoc if you need SF330 compliance" (Llama 4 Maverick, Proposals)

## Record

- Method: https://gtm-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://gtm-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, gtm-ai-index.com.