# Postalytics: how AI models rank it, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition. Named in 54 judge labels across 1 categories by 12 of 12 models. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/vendors/postalytics/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Print | 54% | 1 | 7% | 54 |

## What the models said for it

- "Start with Postalytics Free Plan if you want the most robust features with a free tier. It offers the best balance of functionality" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, Direct mail)
- "Most mid-market B2B companies will find Postalytics to be the best balance of functionality, ease of use, and integration capabilities" (Mistral Small, Direct mail)
- "Most mid-market B2B companies find Postalytics the best balance of ease-of-use, marketing integrations, and flexible pricing." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Direct mail)
- "Marketing teams wanting automation + measurement → Postalytics (best combination of triggers, tracking, and CRM integrations)" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Direct mail)

## And against it

- "unlocking their automated CRM triggers ... requires upgrading to paid plans that cost $199 to $499+ per month" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Direct mail)
- "No A/B Testing: Missing this important feature" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, Direct mail)
- "Cumbersome UI: Learning curve for users not in the product daily" (MiniMax M2.5, Direct mail)
- "No A/B testing, drip campaigns require CRM integration" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Direct mail)

## Record

- Method: https://gtm-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://gtm-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, gtm-ai-index.com.