# Fullcast: how AI models rank it, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition. Named in 33 judge labels across 1 categories by 11 of 12 models. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/vendors/fullcast/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory and quota planning | 18% | 2 | 6% | 33 |

## What the models said for it

- "the strongest overall fit is usually Fullcast if you need territory planning and quota planning together in one RevOps workflow" (Perplexity Sonar, Territory planning)
- "For most mid-market B2B companies using Salesforce, Fullcast is the most purpose-built and operationally impactful choice." (Kimi K2, Territory planning)
- "Fullcast is the industry standard... handles the daily routing, carving, and Salesforce sync better than any other tool" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Territory planning)
- "Highly Recommended): Examples: Pigment, Fullcast, or Abacum... sit perfectly in the mid-market to upper mid-market space" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Territory planning)

## And against it

- "Mid-market RevOps tools (~$20K+/year or $2,400+/user/year)." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Territory planning)
- "start at $20K–$60K/year — likely out of budget range" (Kimi K2, Territory planning)

## Record

- Method: https://gtm-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://gtm-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, gtm-ai-index.com.