# DocuSign CLM: how AI models rank it, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition. Named in 32 judge labels across 1 categories by 12 of 12 models. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/vendors/docusign-clm/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | 2% | 15 | 44% | 32 |

## What the models said for it

- "great if you're already in the DocuSign ecosystem" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, CLM)
- "Already a DocuSign house → DocuSign CLM (no reason to pay for a second e-sign stack)" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, CLM)
- "typically considered by enterprise organizations looking for a mature CLM" (Claude Haiku 4.5, CLM)
- "Choose DocuSign CLM if: Your company already runs entirely on DocuSign" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, CLM)

## And against it

- "Avoid DocuSign CLM and Conga CLM due to their consistent pattern of user complaints around cost, complexity, and support." (Mistral Small, CLM)
- "its CLM product has significant issues... Who should avoid: Small-to-mid-size businesses" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, CLM)
- "Enterprise tools like Ironclad/DocuSign CLM start at $20K+/yr, so avoid for budgets." (Grok 4.1 Fast, CLM)
- "Avoid enterprise CLMs like Ironclad, DocuSign CLM, Agiloft, or ContractPodAi" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, CLM)

## The company

Docusign; http://www.docusign.com/; San Francisco, United States; founded 2003; public, DOCU on Nasdaq. From Wikidata, fetched 2026-09-14.

## Record

- Method: https://gtm-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://gtm-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, gtm-ai-index.com.