# Conga CPQ: how AI models rank it, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition. Named in 34 judge labels across 1 categories by 12 of 12 models. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/vendors/conga-cpq/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ | 0% | 9 | 18% | 34 |

## What the models said for it

- "Advanced rules, CLM/docs, AI pricing; good for configurable products... Higher TCO (~$350K+ for 50 users)" (Grok 4.1 Fast, CPQ)
- "Strong for complex configurations and contracts... Best for enterprises or Salesforce-native teams." (Kimi K2, CPQ)
- "Mid-market sweet spot: DealHub, Conga, and Salesforce CPQ ... are the most commonly evaluated." (Kimi K2, CPQ)
- "Conga differentiates by combining CPQ with contract lifecycle management in one platform" (Kimi K2, CPQ)

## And against it

- "Powerful, but commonly a better fit for larger organizations with CLM needs; setup and ramp-up can be substantial." (Perplexity Sonar, CPQ)
- "worth considering, but it tends to require more implementation effort and ongoing administration" (GPT-5.4 mini, CPQ)
- "Risk level: MODERATE-HIGH - Powerful but requires significant investment and expertise" (Mistral Small, CPQ)
- "Approach Conga CPQ (formerly Apttus) with caution if you want a fast, modern UI" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, CPQ)

## Record

- Method: https://gtm-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://gtm-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, gtm-ai-index.com.