# AutoRFP.ai: how AI models rank it, October 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition. Named in 22 judge labels across 2 categories by 11 of 14 models. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/vendors/autorfp-ai/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFP response software | 2% | 10 | 5% | 21 |
| Proposal software | 0% | 31 | 0% | 1 |

## What the models said for it

- "points to Loopio and AutoRFP.ai as the top two contenders for this specific segment" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, RFP response)
- "Best for: High-growth SaaS and financial services companies requiring extreme accuracy and source transparency." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, RFP response)
- "Prioritize tools like Loopio, Responsive, or AI-native ones (e.g., 1up, AutoRFP.ai) with proven traceability." (Grok 4.20, RFP response)
- "Affordable AI-first approach with a quick setup, focused on speed over complex enterprise governance." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, RFP response)

## And against it

- "priced out of AutoRFP.ai's $899/month Scale plan" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, RFP response)

## In its own words

What AutoRFP.ai's own pages state, read 2026-10-05. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: The agentic AI RFP Software built to win deals, not just respond faster. (https://autorfp.ai/)
- For: global teams (https://autorfp.ai/)
- Price stated: $899, $1299 (https://autorfp.ai/)
- Starting price: 899 (https://autorfp.ai/)
- Free plan or trial: 30-day money-back guarantee (https://autorfp.ai/pricing)
- Integrations claimed: 18 (https://autorfp.ai/)
- Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27001:2022 & SOC 2, GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA, EU Cloud CoC
- Hosting: US, EU, AU, US West (Oregon), EU Central (Frankfurt), Australia East (Sydney)
- Customers named: SugarAI, Workforce.com, fintechOS, perk, Jobylon, IMTC, Red Rover, MedeAnalytics

## What it publishes

Every page autorfp.ai exposes, read 2026-09-29: 309 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 150 pages, 20 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-14
- case study: 14 pages, 1 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-08-18
- conference or event: 7 pages, 2 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-10-15
- comparison: 28 pages, 14 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-16
- template or tool: 4 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- glossary or explainer: 3 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-04-15
- Recent: 2026-10-15 conference or event: Sme chase and how to win it https://autorfp.ai/events/sme-chase-and-how-to-win-it
- Recent: 2026-09-16 comparison: Best govwin alternatives https://autorfp.ai/blog/best-govwin-alternatives
- Recent: 2026-09-14 blog: 1up pricing https://autorfp.ai/blog/1up-pricing
- Recent: 2026-09-14 blog: How Much Does AutogenAI Cost in 2026? https://autorfp.ai/blog/autogenai-pricing
- Recent: 2026-09-14 blog: Iris pricing https://autorfp.ai/blog/iris-pricing
- Recent: 2026-09-14 comparison: Responsive vs autogenai comparison https://autorfp.ai/blog/responsive-vs-autogenai-comparison

## Record

- Method: https://gtm-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://gtm-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as GTM AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, gtm-ai-index.com.