# Supademo vs Walnut: which do AI models recommend for interactive demos, October 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Interactive demo platforms. Zero of fourteen models named Supademo first on the direct prompt; one named Walnut. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/sales/interactive-demo-platforms/supademo-vs-walnut/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supademo | 20% | #3 of 9 | 2% | 43 | 14 of 14 |
| Walnut | 2% | #5 of 9 | 16% | 49 | 14 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Muse Glimmer 30B: walnut first (first choices: Navattic, Walnut) (alternatives: Arcade, Demoboost, Storylane)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Storylane) (alternatives: Arcade, Navattic, Supademo, Walnut)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Navattic) (alternatives: Consensus, Demostack, Storylane, Supademo)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Navattic) (alternatives: Storylane, Walnut)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: Demoboost, Navattic, Storylane) (alternatives: Walnut)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Navattic) (alternatives: Demoboost, Storylane, Walnut)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: Demoboost) (alternatives: Navattic, Walnut)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Storylane) (alternatives: Navattic, Walnut)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Navattic, Storylane) (alternatives: Demoboost, Walnut)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Navattic) (alternatives: Storylane, Supademo, Walnut)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Navattic) (alternatives: Storylane, Walnut)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: Storylane) (alternatives: Navattic, Reprise, Walnut)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Storylane) (alternatives: Arcade, Demoboost, Navattic)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Storylane) (alternatives: Arcade, Demoboost, Guideflow, Navattic)

## What the models said about Supademo

- "Who to Avoid/Caution: Supademo (specifically the lower tiers)... its reliance on screenshot-based interactions means every UI tweak can render a demo inaccurate." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Supademo is the strongest general pick because multiple comparison guides describe it as the budget-friendly option" (Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Supademo stands out as the best interactive demo platform based on its generous free tier and low entry pricing." (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Supademo - Best Budget Pick ... Consistently rated as the best budget option with a generous free plan" (Kimi K2, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Walnut

- "Platforms with Known Concerns ... Walnut - High cost barrier: Starts at ~$575/month with no free tier or trial" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Walnut does not natively support mobile app capturing; it is restricted to web-based products." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Skip premium options like HowdyGo ($159+/mo), Navattic, and Walnut" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "Choose Walnut if you are an Enterprise sales team with long sales cycles who needs to send a fully customized demo to every specific account." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Walnut is the most commonly cited fit for mid-market and enterprise B2B sales teams that need to personalize demos at volume" (Muse Glimmer 30B, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Full sandbox personalization with custom pricing | High-fidelity, enterprise-grade sandboxes | Higher price point" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, comparative prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.