# Fullcast vs Maptive: which do AI models recommend for territory planning, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, Territory and quota planning. Six of twelve models named Fullcast first on the direct prompt; zero named Maptive. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/revops/territory-and-quota-planning/fullcast-vs-maptive/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fullcast | 18% | #2 of 11 | 6% | 33 | 11 of 12 |
| Maptive | 2% | #6 of 11 | 5% | 21 | 11 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: fullcast first (first choices: Fullcast) (alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Pigment, QuotaPath, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning)
- Perplexity Sonar: fullcast first (first choices: Fullcast) (alternatives: CaptivateIQ)
- Mistral Small: fullcast first (first choices: Fullcast, QuotaPath) (alternatives: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Everstage, Varicent)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: fullcast first (first choices: Fullcast) (alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Salesforce Sales Planning + Territory Management)
- Kimi K2: fullcast first (first choices: Fullcast, Pigment) (alternatives: CaptivateIQ)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: fullcast first (first choices: Fullcast) (alternatives: Salesforce Sales Planning / Territory Planning Add-On, Vena)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: CaptivateIQ Planning) (alternatives: Clari Align, Fullcast, eSpatial)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: CaptivateIQ) (alternatives: Everstage, Fullcast, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning, eSpatial)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: CaptivateIQ) (alternatives: Fullcast, SalesRabbit, Varicent)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: CaptivateIQ Planning) (alternatives: Salesforce Sales Planning / Territory Planning, Xactly)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: CaptivateIQ) (alternatives: SalesRabbit, Territory Helper)

## What the models said about Fullcast

- "Mid-market RevOps tools (~$20K+/year or $2,400+/user/year)." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "start at $20K–$60K/year — likely out of budget range" (Kimi K2, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "the strongest overall fit is usually Fullcast if you need territory planning and quota planning together in one RevOps workflow" (Perplexity Sonar, direct prompt, first choice)
- "For most mid-market B2B companies using Salesforce, Fullcast is the most purpose-built and operationally impactful choice." (Kimi K2, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Fullcast is the industry standard... handles the daily routing, carving, and Salesforce sync better than any other tool" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Maptive

- "Mapping-first tools with algorithmic territory balancing at lower cost, but no quota or capacity planning" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt, soft negative)
- "Maptive is best for teams that want every mapping feature included at a flat per-user price" (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- ""We just need to draw clean maps and visualize coverage" → eSpatial, Maptive, or Salesforce Maps" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, comparative prompt, alternative)
- "eSpatial, Maptive | Excellent for algorithmic balancing and deep GIS visualization." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, scale prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.