# CaptivateIQ vs Maptive: which do AI models recommend for territory planning, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, Territory and quota planning. Three of twelve models named CaptivateIQ first on the direct prompt; zero named Maptive. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/revops/territory-and-quota-planning/captivateiq-vs-maptive/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaptivateIQ | 30% | #1 of 11 | 9% | 44 | 12 of 12 |
| Maptive | 2% | #6 of 11 | 5% | 21 | 11 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Grok 4.1 Fast: captivateiq first (first choices: CaptivateIQ) (alternatives: Everstage, Fullcast, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning, eSpatial)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: captivateiq first (first choices: CaptivateIQ) (alternatives: SalesRabbit, Territory Helper)
- MiniMax M2.5: captivateiq first (first choices: CaptivateIQ) (alternatives: Fullcast, SalesRabbit, Varicent)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Fullcast) (alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Pigment, QuotaPath, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Fullcast) (alternatives: CaptivateIQ)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Fullcast) (alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Salesforce Sales Planning + Territory Management)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Fullcast, Pigment) (alternatives: CaptivateIQ)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: CaptivateIQ Planning) (alternatives: Clari Align, Fullcast, eSpatial)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: CaptivateIQ Planning) (alternatives: Salesforce Sales Planning / Territory Planning, Xactly)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Fullcast, QuotaPath) (alternatives: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Everstage, Varicent)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Fullcast) (alternatives: Salesforce Sales Planning / Territory Planning Add-On, Vena)

## What the models said about CaptivateIQ

- "Mid-market RevOps tools (~$20K+/year or $2,400+/user/year)." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "End-to-End Revenue Plan | CaptivateIQ, Forma.ai | Combines territory carving, quota setting, and variable comp in a single agile platform." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)
- "CaptivateIQ is widely considered the strongest option for mid-market teams because it eliminates the need for multiple disconnected tools." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Maptive

- "Mapping-first tools with algorithmic territory balancing at lower cost, but no quota or capacity planning" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt, soft negative)
- "Maptive is best for teams that want every mapping feature included at a flat per-user price" (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- ""We just need to draw clean maps and visualize coverage" → eSpatial, Maptive, or Salesforce Maps" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, comparative prompt, alternative)
- "eSpatial, Maptive | Excellent for algorithmic balancing and deep GIS visualization." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, scale prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.