# Reputation vs Grade.us: which do AI models recommend for reviews, October 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Review and reputation management. One of fourteen models named Reputation first on the direct prompt; one named Grade.us. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/review-and-reputation-management/reputation-vs-grade-us/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reputation | 2% | #5 of 9 | 25% | 28 | 13 of 14 |
| Grade.us | 2% | #6 of 9 | 8% | 12 | 8 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Perplexity Sonar: reputation first (first choices: Reputation) (alternatives: Birdeye, Reviewflowz)
- Llama 4 Maverick: grade.us first (first choices: Bazaarvoice, Grade.us, ReviewTrackers)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: G2 Buyer Intent) (alternatives: Birdeye, Reputation)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: Bazaarvoice, ReviewTrackers) (alternatives: Grade.us, Podium)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Birdeye) (alternatives: Grade.us, Reputation, Yext)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Birdeye, Podium) (alternatives: Capterra, G2 Buyer Intent, Grade.us, Reputation)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: G2 Buyer Intent) (alternatives: Birdeye, Reputation)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: G2 Buyer Intent) (alternatives: Capterra, Clutch, Reviewflowz, TrustRadius)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Reviewflowz) (alternatives: Birdeye, HiFiveStar, Sprout Social, Trustpilot)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Birdeye) (alternatives: Podium, ReviewTrackers, Trustpilot, Yotpo)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Birdeye, Pulse) (alternatives: Reviewflowz, TrustRadius, TrustSpot)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: ReviewTrackers) (alternatives: G2 Marketing Solutions, Reviewflowz)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: ReviewTrackers) (alternatives: Capterra, G2 Buyer Intent)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: ReviewTrackers) (alternatives: Birdeye, G2 Marketing Solutions, Podium, Trustpilot)

## What the models said about Reputation

- "Platforms to Be Cautious About ... Reputation.com ... BBB rating of D- ... Reputation.com and Yext are the two most consistently flagged *major* platforms in my research." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "avoid Reputation.com unless you're a large enterprise (it starts at ~$520/month and is overly complex for mid-market)" (Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt, hard negative)
- "its software version receives mixed to negative reviews on platforms like G2 regarding usability and technical reliability" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "the strongest single pick from the results is Reputation because G2 explicitly labels it "Best for Mid-Market"" (Perplexity Sonar, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Reputation.com is another strong option, especially for managing customer reviews and local listings" (Mistral Small, paraphrase prompt, alternative)
- "Reputation is another option, particularly if managing multiple locations is central to the job" (GPT-6 Luna, direct prompt, alternative)

## What the models said about Grade.us

- "However, pricing has increased recently (now starting at $180/month for Professional plans in some cases)" (Kimi K2, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "The best online review management platform for a mid-market B2B company is ReviewTrackers, Grade.us, or Bazaarvoice." (Llama 4 Maverick, direct prompt, first choice)
- "For agencies needing white-label solutions: Grade.us offers strong reporting and branding options" (MiniMax M2.5, comparative prompt, alternative)
- "A mid-market-focused platform with strong white-label options and agency-friendly workflows." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.