# Foursquare vs Kontakt.io: which do AI models recommend for proximity, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, Retail, proximity and IoT marketing. One of twelve models named Foursquare first on the direct prompt; zero named Kontakt.io. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/retail-proximity-and-iot-marketing/foursquare-vs-kontakt-io/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foursquare | 6% | #3 of 8 | 4% | 26 | 9 of 12 |
| Kontakt.io | 2% | #5 of 8 | 7% | 27 | 11 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Mistral Small: foursquare first (first choices: Foursquare, Radar) (alternatives: CleverTap, Insider, Kontakt.io, Kumulos, PlotProjects)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: InMarket) (alternatives: Apollo.io, Foursquare)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Radar) (alternatives: Foursquare, Kontakt.io)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Gimbal, GroundTruth, Simpli.fi)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Foursquare Proximity) (alternatives: 6sense, Demandbase)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Uniqode) (alternatives: Purple, Radar)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Propensity) (alternatives: Estimote, InMarket)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: CleverTap) (alternatives: PlotProjects, Simpli.fi)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: GroundTruth, StackAdapt) (alternatives: Hey Sid, InZynk, Radar)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Radar) (alternatives: AdRoll ABM, Phunware, PlotProjects)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Radar) (alternatives: InMarket)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Radar)

## What the models said about Foursquare

- "Caution: Likely overkill for mid-sized B2B teams" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt, soft negative)
- "Prioritize platforms with strong privacy postures (e.g., SOC 2 compliance, no data resale, opt-out tools) like Foursquare or Kontakt.io." (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, first choice)
- "For most mid-market B2B companies: Radar or Foursquare - both offer excellent location intelligence" (Mistral Small, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Foursquare is a highly recommended location-based and in-store marketing tool for mid-sized B2B companies" (Llama 4 Maverick, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Kontakt.io

- "Avoid: Enterprise tools like Kontakt.io" (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "more of a managed, enterprise-leaning solution, so it's usually not the cheapest choice for a tight budget" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "Kontakt.io (Best Overall) ... Highest overall score (9.6/10) across features, ease of use, and value" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Kontakt.io is considered the best overall platform for indoor location, with a score of 9.6/10." (Llama 4 Maverick, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Best overall: Kontakt.io (enterprise) and Foursquare (no-hardware approach)" (MiniMax M2.5, comparative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.