# Mention vs Meltwater: which do AI models recommend for PR, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, PR and media monitoring. Zero of twelve models named Mention first on the direct prompt; one named Meltwater. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/pr-and-media-monitoring/mention-vs-meltwater/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mention | 4% | #6 of 13 | 17% | 24 | 11 of 12 |
| Meltwater | 4% | #7 of 13 | 43% | 56 | 12 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Kimi K2: meltwater first (first choices: Meltwater, Muck Rack) (alternatives: Brand24, Mention, Semrush AI PR Toolkit, Talkwalker)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: Brand24, Cision, Meltwater, Mention)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: CisionOne, Meltwater)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: Meltwater, Propel PRM, Semrush AI PR Toolkit)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Semrush AI PR Toolkit) (alternatives: Brand24, Cision, Meltwater)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Meltwater, Semrush AI PR Toolkit)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24) (alternatives: Critical Mention, Mention, Respona)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24, Semrush AI PR Toolkit)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: Brand24, CisionOne, Onclusive, Semrush, Semrush AI PR Toolkit)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Agility PR Solutions) (alternatives: Muck Rack, Semrush)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Agility PR Solutions, Muck Rack) (alternatives: Semrush AI PR Toolkit)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Agility PR Solutions) (alternatives: Muck Rack, Semrush AI PR Toolkit)

## What the models said about Mention

- "it has since eliminated its affordable plans (now ~$599/mo minimum). Most older articles recommending it are outdated." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "Was budget-friendly but shifted enterprise. Skip unless sales quotes a deal." (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "auto-deletion after 12 months and unclear data sovereignty concerns" (Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Mention - This affordable tool for PR professionals tracks brand callouts across social platforms and the web" (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Best overall for a limited budget: Mention or Brand24" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Budget monitoring | Brand24, Mention, Awario" (Kimi K2, negative prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Meltwater

- "Meltwater is notorious for its aggressive auto-renewal clauses... they will legally lock you into another full year" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "rely on opaque pricing, aggressive contract terms, and bundling to maximize revenue... avoid the all-in-one suites" (Kimi K2, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Avoid Meltwater and Cision unless you have specific needs that outweigh their significant contract risks" (Mistral Small, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Enterprise PR + social in one place → Meltwater or Cision ... Standout Strength: Widest source coverage and best PR-social integration" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Often considered the industry leader for pure media monitoring... Best archive of TV, Radio, and Print news." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Meltwater | Enterprise brands needing deep social listening | 300K+ news sources, AI-powered insights" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, comparative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.