# Agility PR Solutions vs Mention: which do AI models recommend for PR, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, PR and media monitoring. Four of twelve models named Agility PR Solutions first on the direct prompt; zero named Mention. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/pr-and-media-monitoring/agility-pr-solutions-vs-mention/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agility PR Solutions | 12% | #5 of 13 | 11% | 28 | 11 of 12 |
| Mention | 4% | #6 of 13 | 17% | 24 | 11 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Llama 4 Maverick: agility pr solutions first (first choices: Agility PR Solutions) (alternatives: Muck Rack, Semrush)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: agility pr solutions first (first choices: Agility PR Solutions, Muck Rack) (alternatives: Semrush AI PR Toolkit)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: agility pr solutions first (first choices: Agility PR Solutions) (alternatives: Muck Rack, Semrush AI PR Toolkit)
- MiniMax M2.5: agility pr solutions first (first choices: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24) (alternatives: Critical Mention, Mention, Respona)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: Brand24, Cision, Meltwater, Mention)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24, Semrush AI PR Toolkit)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Meltwater, Semrush AI PR Toolkit)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Meltwater, Muck Rack) (alternatives: Brand24, Mention, Semrush AI PR Toolkit, Talkwalker)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: CisionOne, Meltwater)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: Meltwater, Propel PRM, Semrush AI PR Toolkit)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Semrush AI PR Toolkit) (alternatives: Brand24, Cision, Meltwater)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Muck Rack) (alternatives: Brand24, CisionOne, Onclusive, Semrush, Semrush AI PR Toolkit)

## What the models said about Agility PR Solutions

- "Agility utilizes a highly rigid annual contract with a 90-day auto-renewal notice requirement" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "but they are more expensive and may be more suitable for larger companies" (Llama 4 Maverick, paraphrase prompt, soft negative)
- "MODERATE CAUTION" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "I'd recommend starting trials with Brand24 (best value) and Agility PR Solutions (best for AI-enhanced features)" (MiniMax M2.5, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Top Recommendation: Agility PR Solutions ... widely regarded as the best mid-market-focused platform" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, direct prompt, first choice)
- "The best PR and media monitoring platform for a mid-market B2B company is Agility PR Solutions" (Llama 4 Maverick, direct prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Mention

- "it has since eliminated its affordable plans (now ~$599/mo minimum). Most older articles recommending it are outdated." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "Was budget-friendly but shifted enterprise. Skip unless sales quotes a deal." (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "auto-deletion after 12 months and unclear data sovereignty concerns" (Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Mention - This affordable tool for PR professionals tracks brand callouts across social platforms and the web" (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Best overall for a limited budget: Mention or Brand24" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Budget monitoring | Brand24, Mention, Awario" (Kimi K2, negative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.