# BrightLocal vs Semrush Local: which do AI models recommend for local listings, October 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Local listings management. Seven of fourteen models named BrightLocal first on the direct prompt; one named Semrush Local. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/local-listings-management/brightlocal-vs-semrush-local/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BrightLocal | 33% | #1 of 10 | 10% | 58 | 13 of 14 |
| Semrush Local | 4% | #5 of 10 | 13% | 31 | 12 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Grok 4.1 Fast: brightlocal first (first choices: BrightLocal) (alternatives: Moz Local, Synup, Yext)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: brightlocal first (first choices: BrightLocal) (alternatives: Semrush Local, Synup, Uberall)
- Kimi K2: brightlocal first (first choices: BrightLocal) (alternatives: SOCi, Semrush Listing Management, Synup)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: brightlocal first (first choices: BrightLocal) (alternatives: LocaliQ, Semrush Local, Yext)
- MiniMax M2.5: brightlocal first (first choices: BrightLocal) (alternatives: Synup, Yext)
- GPT-6 Luna: brightlocal first (first choices: BrightLocal) (alternatives: Yext)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: brightlocal first (first choices: BrightLocal, Synup) (alternatives: Semrush Listing Management)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: semrush local first (first choices: Semrush Local) (alternatives: BrightLocal, Synup, Whitespark)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Yext) (alternatives: Birdeye, BrightLocal, SOCi, Synup)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Synup) (alternatives: BrightLocal, Semrush Listing Management, Uberall, Yext)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Synup) (alternatives: BrightLocal, Uberall)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Yext) (alternatives: Uberall)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Birdeye, Yext) (alternatives: Moz Local, Synup)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: BrightLocal Track, Synup) (alternatives: Birdeye, Moz Local, Yext)

## What the models said about BrightLocal

- "Platforms like BrightLocal offer free trials and low-cost monitoring tools, though their core automated publishing features usually require a paid plan." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "BrightLocal's citation services can be inexpensive on a per-listing basis, but it is not the cheapest all-in-one software option" (Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt, soft negative)
- ""BrightLocal and Whitespark are okay, but they toss you into a lot of really low quality, trashy directories."" (Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "BrightLocal is the most well-rounded option, combining listings management with rank tracking, review monitoring, and audit tools." (Kimi K2, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "For a U.S. small business, I'd pick BrightLocal if you want an ongoing listings-management platform without paying enterprise prices." (GPT-6 Luna, budget prompt, first choice)
- "The Best Overall: BrightLocal ... the gold standard for mid-sized companies managing 5 to 50+ locations." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Semrush Local

- "Semrush Local Pro is another option, but it's listed at $60/month per location billed annually, so it costs more for listings management alone." (GPT-6 Luna, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "though it may lack some of the advanced enterprise workflow permissions of a standalone Yext/Uberall" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, soft negative)
- "Semrush Local starts at $30/mo per location billed annually ... but these are generally pricier" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "I'd most likely recommend Semrush Local as the default choice." (GPT-5.4 mini, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "adding Semrush Local is almost always the most efficient path" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)
- "The integration with your existing keyword and competitive research data reduces tool sprawl, though multi-location workflows aren't as robust" (Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.