# CreatorIQ vs Modash: which do AI models recommend for influencer, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, Influencer platforms. One of twelve models named CreatorIQ first on the direct prompt; two named Modash. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/influencer-platforms/creatoriq-vs-modash/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CreatorIQ | 8% | #4 of 14 | 41% | 37 | 11 of 12 |
| Modash | 4% | #6 of 14 | 8% | 36 | 12 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- GPT-5.4 mini: creatoriq first (first choices: CreatorIQ) (alternatives: Aspire, Upfluence, impact.com)
- Perplexity Sonar: modash first (first choices: Favikon, Modash) (alternatives: CreatorIQ, Influencity, Traackr)
- Llama 4 Maverick: modash first (first choices: Modash) (alternatives: Favikon, Skrapp)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Favikon) (alternatives: Kolsquare, Modash, Skrapp, Traackr)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Favikon) (alternatives: Influencity, Modash, Upfluence)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Favikon) (alternatives: GoByline, Kolsquare, Modash, Onalytica, Traackr)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Favikon) (alternatives: GRIN, Modash)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: impact.com) (alternatives: Aspire, Modash, Traackr)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Favikon) (alternatives: Limelight, Onalytica, SparkToro)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Favikon) (alternatives: Influencity)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Favikon, LinkedIn Creator Marketplace) (alternatives: Meltwater, Traackr)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Influencity) (alternatives: Limelight)

## What the models said about CreatorIQ

- "What to avoid: Most mainstream tools like CreatorIQ, GRIN, and Upfluence are primarily designed for B2C/e-commerce" (MiniMax M2.5, paraphrase prompt, hard negative)
- "What I'd Avoid for B2B ... CreatorIQ | Powerful but genuinely enterprise-grade; overkill and overpriced for mid-market B2B" (Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt, hard negative)
- "Do not sign an expensive annual contract with a legacy B2C influencer platform (like GRIN or CreatorIQ)." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "1. CreatorIQ - Best for: Large enterprise brands and agencies managing global programs ... Enterprise-grade with mature analytics" (Mistral Small, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Choose CreatorIQ if you are a large corporate brand or agency requiring maximum security, enterprise governance, and global scaling." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "CreatorIQ — strong for governance, integrations, reporting depth, security, and multi-team operations" (MiniMax M2.5, scale prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Modash

- "Platforms to AVOID on a Limited Budget - Modash \u2014 $299\u2013$599/month" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "Avoid Modash for pure B2B unless you're extending existing B2C campaigns" (Mistral Small, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "$199/mo (annual; trial) | Deep discovery | 350M+ DB, audience analytics; not free long-term." (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "alternatives to these platforms, such as Modash, which is an influencer search software that has a database of creators on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube" (Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt, first choice)
- "Look for platforms that offer month-to-month pricing or pay-as-you-go models (like Modash, Collabstr, or Promoty)." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, first choice)
- "if your use case is broader and channel-agnostic, Modash is the safer all-around choice" (Perplexity Sonar, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.