# Lusha vs UpLead: which do AI models recommend for enrichment, October 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Data enrichment. Zero of fourteen models named Lusha first on the direct prompt; one named UpLead. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/gtm-data/data-enrichment/lusha-vs-uplead/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lusha | 2% | #6 of 12 | 16% | 45 | 14 of 14 |
| UpLead | 2% | #8 of 12 | 7% | 14 | 8 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Qwen 3.7 Flash: uplead first (first choices: UpLead) (alternatives: Apollo.io, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Apollo.io) (alternatives: Lusha, ZoomInfo)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Apollo.io) (alternatives: Cognism, UpLead)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Apollo.io) (alternatives: Cognism, UpLead)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: ZoomInfo) (alternatives: Clay, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, UpLead)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Apollo.io) (alternatives: Cleanlist, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Lusha)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: Apollo.io) (alternatives: HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, UpLead)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Apollo.io) (alternatives: Cleanlist, Cognism, ZoomInfo)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Clay) (alternatives: Apollo.io, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, ZoomInfo)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Apollo.io) (alternatives: Clay, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Apollo.io) (alternatives: Clay, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Apollo.io, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence) (alternatives: ZoomInfo)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Apollo.io) (alternatives: Clay, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Apollo.io) (alternatives: Cognism, HubSpot Sales Hub)

## What the models said about Lusha

- "Low email accuracy: Independent checks suggest only about 68% email return at roughly 82% accuracy, which is below industry standards." (Mistral Small, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Tools that have faced regulatory actions (e.g., Lusha's Italy fine) should be avoided in sensitive jurisdictions." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Some users report issues with outdated contact information and relatively high pricing for infrequent use." (Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Safer bets from reviews: Tools like Lusha (98% email accuracy, free tier)" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, first choice)
- "Apollo.io or Lusha are the right entry points. Both offer free tiers" (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about UpLead

- "Limited coverage/filters; varying accuracy across industries; poor support." (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Top Recommendation: UpLead" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.