# Osano vs iubenda: which do AI models recommend for consent, September 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, Consent and privacy management. Six of twelve models named Osano first on the direct prompt; zero named iubenda. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/gtm-data/consent-and-privacy-management/osano-vs-iubenda/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osano | 19% | #2 of 15 | 14% | 42 | 12 of 12 |
| iubenda | 6% | #5 of 15 | 9% | 23 | 12 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- GPT-5.4 mini: osano first (first choices: Osano) (alternatives: TrustArc)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: osano first (first choices: Osano) (alternatives: Ketch, Usercentrics)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: osano first (first choices: Osano) (alternatives: Enzuzo)
- Llama 4 Maverick: osano first (first choices: Osano) (alternatives: Enzuzo)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: osano first (first choices: Osano) (alternatives: Secure Privacy, Usercentrics)
- Kimi K2: osano first (first choices: Enzuzo, Osano) (alternatives: CookieYes, Cookiebot, Usercentrics CMP, iubenda)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Enzuzo) (alternatives: Cookiebot, OneTrust, Osano, Usercentrics)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Enzuzo) (alternatives: CookieYes, Osano, Secure Privacy, Usercentrics)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: Enzuzo) (alternatives: Ketch, Osano, Termly, Usercentrics)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Enzuzo, Usercentrics) (alternatives: CookieYes, Osano)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Cookiebot, Enzuzo) (alternatives: OneTrust, TrustArc)

## What the models said about Osano

- "Osano: Free plan is limited, Plus plan starts at $239.99/month" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "if you're a larger, more heavily regulated organization... but they're usually more than a mid-sized B2B company needs" (GPT-5.4 mini, paraphrase prompt, soft negative)
- "more enterprise-oriented, but sometimes worth comparing if you need stronger compliance workflows" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "Why I'd lean Osano for many mid-market B2B firms: it explicitly positions itself as best for midsize businesses prioritizing automation in consent management" (GPT-5.4 mini, direct prompt, first choice)
- "The best consent management platform for a mid-market B2B company is Osano, as it is best for mid-market teams scaling into a full privacy program" (Llama 4 Maverick, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Osano: *Highly recommended for mid-market.* It is incredibly easy to set up, highly automated, and includes built-in DSAR management." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about iubenda

- "good add-on docs, but scales poorly multi-domain" (Grok 4.1 Fast, paraphrase prompt, soft negative)
- "iubenda - Uses US cloud services" (Mistral Small, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "I'd generally recommend iubenda if you want cookie consent plus broader privacy compliance in one platform" (GPT-5.4 mini, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "My Top Pick for Mid-Sized B2B: Iubenda is often the "sweet spot."" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "## Top Recommendation: iubenda" (Claude Haiku 4.5, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.