# Vitally vs Gainsight Customer Success: which do AI models recommend for customer success, October 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Customer success platforms. Three of fourteen models named Vitally first on the direct prompt; zero named Gainsight Customer Success. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/customer/customer-success-platforms/vitally-vs-gainsight-customer-success/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitally | 19% | #2 of 10 | 9% | 57 | 14 of 14 |
| Gainsight Customer Success | 2% | #8 of 10 | 54% | 59 | 14 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Claude Haiku 4.5: vitally first (first choices: Vitally) (alternatives: ChurnZero, ClientSuccess)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: vitally first (first choices: ChurnZero, Vitally) (alternatives: Custify, HubSpot Service Hub, Skalin, Totango)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: vitally first (first choices: ChurnZero, Vitally) (alternatives: Totango)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: ChurnZero, Planhat) (alternatives: Gainsight Customer Success)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: ChurnZero) (alternatives: Planhat, Totango, Vitally)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: ChurnZero) (alternatives: Vitally)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: ChurnZero) (alternatives: Custify, Vitally)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: Skalin) (alternatives: ChurnZero, Custify, Gainsight Customer Success, Planhat, Vitally)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Skalin) (alternatives: ChurnZero, ClientSuccess, Custify, Totango, Vitally)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: ChurnZero) (alternatives: Skalin, Userpilot, Vitally)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: ChurnZero) (alternatives: Totango, Vitally)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: ChurnZero, Skalin) (alternatives: Totango, Vitally)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: ChurnZero) (alternatives: Planhat, Vitally)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: ChurnZero) (alternatives: ClientSuccess, Custify, Planhat, Skalin, Totango, Vitally)

## What the models said about Vitally

- "Account-Based Pricing Models (Planhat, Vitally, ChurnZero)... costs can escalate quickly without corresponding value" (Mistral Small, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Opaque Enterprise Pricing: Mid-market teams routinely see quotes exceeding $100K/year" (Kimi K2, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Unlike Vitally (~$299+/mo, great for growth metrics but pricier)" (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "Top pick for mid-market and fast-growing teams: ChurnZero or Vitally, depending on whether you prioritize usage-based health scoring or modern UX." (Muse Glimmer 30B, scale prompt, first choice)
- "ChurnZero or Vitally, depending on whether you prioritize usage-based health scoring or modern UX." (Llama 4 Maverick, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "Prioritize high-rated, user-loved options like Vitally, Custify, or Skalin" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Gainsight Customer Success

- "Gainsight is the most complex, most expensive platform, and one most likely to fail adoption tests at companies that aren't ready for it" (Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Avoid Gainsight if you have a team of fewer than 10 to 15 CSMs or lack a dedicated CS Operations resource." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Platforms with Documented Concerns ### Gainsight ⚠️ ... Security Incident (Nov 2025)... High Cost" (Kimi K2, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Gainsight — *The Enterprise Leader* ... The most mature, feature-rich platform on the market" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Gainsight: Leader in Gartner MQ and Forrester Wave; dominant in G2 reviews." (Grok 4.1 Fast, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Most feature-rich platform on the market ... Gartner Magic Quadrant leader" (MiniMax M2.5, comparative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.