# EvaluAgent vs Level AI: which do AI models recommend for Contact center QA, October 2026

GTM AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Contact center quality assurance. Six of fourteen models named EvaluAgent first on the direct prompt; one named Level AI. Page: https://gtm-ai-index.com/customer/contact-center-quality-assurance/evaluagent-vs-level-ai/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EvaluAgent | 28% | #1 of 13 | 4% | 45 | 14 of 14 |
| Level AI | 2% | #8 of 13 | 0% | 12 | 9 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Grok 4.1 Fast: evaluagent first (first choices: EvaluAgent, Scorebuddy) (alternatives: Balto, Talkdesk QM, Zendesk QA)
- Mistral Small: evaluagent first (first choices: EvaluAgent, Scorebuddy) (alternatives: Talkdesk)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: evaluagent first (first choices: EvaluAgent) (alternatives: AmplifAI, Observe.AI, Scorebuddy, Talkdesk, Zendesk QA)
- Llama 4 Maverick: evaluagent first (first choices: EvaluAgent) (alternatives: GetApp, Scorebuddy)
- Kimi K2: evaluagent first (first choices: EvaluAgent) (alternatives: Playvox, ScorebuddyCX, Zendesk QA)
- GPT-6 Luna: evaluagent first (first choices: EvaluAgent) (alternatives: CallMiner Eureka, NICE CXone Quality Management)
- GPT-5.4 mini: level ai first (first choices: Level AI) (alternatives: Calabrio ONE, Scorebuddy, Zendesk QA)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Scorebuddy) (alternatives: Convin, EvaluAgent, Gong, Level AI)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Zendesk QA) (alternatives: EvaluAgent, Level AI, MaestroQA)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Scorebuddy) (alternatives: AmplifAI, Balto, EvaluAgent, Level AI)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: AmplifAI, Balto) (alternatives: EvaluAgent, Playvox QM, Scorebuddy)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Scorebuddy) (alternatives: EvaluAgent, Voxjar, Zendesk QA)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Observe.AI, Zendesk QA) (alternatives: EvaluAgent, Playvox, Scorebuddy)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: CallMiner Eureka) (alternatives: Five9 Agent Connect, MaestroQA, NICE CXone Quality Management, Playvox)

## What the models said about EvaluAgent

- "Users report repeated friction integrating with platforms like Amazon Connect, despite vendor instructions" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "limited dashboard customization for evaluagent" (GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "For most companies with limited budgets, EvaluAgent at $35 per user offers the best balance of affordability and functionality." (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- "My default pick: evaluagent—if you already have a contact-center platform and want to add QA without replacing it." (GPT-6 Luna, direct prompt, first choice)
- "EvaluAgent: A mid-market blended AI + human QA platform with autoQM, conversation intelligence, and scorecard builder." (Llama 4 Maverick, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Level AI

- "my default recommendation is Level AI if you want the most balanced mix of AI-powered QA, omnichannel coverage, and mid-market fit" (GPT-5.4 mini, direct prompt, first choice)
- "often ranked #1 for comprehensive QA" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Level AI is recommended for mid-market contact centers consolidating conversation intelligence and QA on one platform" (Claude Haiku 4.5, direct prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.